Fancher v. Baker
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentOsro Cobb, Justice
The majority has found it unnecessary, in considering this appeal, to pass upon the question, if any, as to the existence of a genuine factual issue between the parties as to the mission and scope of activities of appellee as an employee of the United States at the time of the collision. The majority has adopted the view that such an issue is not sufficiently raised by appellant for our review. I do not agree.
Appellant’s entire appeal is bottomed upon a single Point, and I quote:
“Court erred in granting Defendant-Appellees motion for summary judgment since 28 U. S. Code Section '2679 grants…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Colby v. KluneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Subin v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.