Legal Opinion

People v. Collins

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1969No. Crim. 7378PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElkington, J.

Defendants Ralph Collins and Nathaniel Malone, having waived trial by jury, were found guilty by the court of a violation of Penal Code section 464. After judgment imposing suspended state prison sentences, they were placed on probation. Their appeal is from the judgment.

The record discloses the following. “Maximart’’ is a discount store in Palo Alto. It occupies a building at the rear of which is a large storeroom, separated from the public store portion by a concrete block wall. The storeroom may be entered by means of a metal-covered wooden door. When the store is closed this door is kept…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Prager v. IsrealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. In Re MarquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Pasadena University v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. In Re WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harvard Investment Co. v. Gap Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. People v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1977
  3. Cook v. Superior Court of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. People v. CardwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API