Legal Opinion

Baker v. Citizens' State Bank of Okeene

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 4, 1917No. 8386PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

This action was instituted by the plaintiff in error in the district court of Blaine county for the recovery of $663.50, being the penalty of twice the amount of usurious interest alleged to have been exacted by the bank from the plaintiff in error upon a series of transactions had between them. The bank interposed a defense of a general denial, a plea of payment by third party, novation, and the statute of limitation, all of which was denied by the plaintiff in error.

The cause was tried to a jury, and a judgment rendered for the plaintiff in error for the full amount sued…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ten Cate v. SharpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  2. Southwestern Cotton Seed Oil v. the Bank of StroudSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  3. Citizens' State Bank of Ft. Gibson v. StrahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Caddo Nat. Bank v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Bath v. DumasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Bilby v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Clark v. HerbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Dubs ex rel. Dubs v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API