Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Thomson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 26, 1926PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

The question to be determined on this appeal is, whether the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The defendants are stockbrokers with whom the plaintiff had an account. The complaint for a first cause of action alleges that at plaintiff’s request the defendants purchased for his account 100 shares of Remington Typewriter stock, which were carried for plaintiff with certain other stocks and held by defendants as collateral security for the payment of the balance owed by plaintiff; that an account was rendered to plaintiff showing a balance due as of August 1,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Horton v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Lawrence v. . MaxwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. In Re the Accounting of Mercantile Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Caswell v. . PutnamNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. McIntyre v. WhitneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. Salmon Weed & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  2. General Meter Service Corp. v. Manufacturers Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Lockie v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
  4. S & L Paving Corp. v. MacMurray Tractor, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Albert v. Parking Stations of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API