Legal Opinion

Fuqua v. City of Mobile

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 4, 1928No. 1 Div. 512PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, X.The Court .of Appeals held as a valid enactment and free from any constitutional inhibition the Act of August 11, 1927 (Local Acts 1927, p. 150), entitled:

“An act to alter and rearrange the boundary lines of the city of Mobile in the state of Alabama, so as to include within the corporate limits of said city certain, territory not included therein.”

Petitioner, a merchant engaged in business and owning real and personal property within the new territory added to the city by said act, and interested as a taxpayer, by appropriate proceedings challenges the constitutional validity of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ballentyne v. WickershamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Ex parte PollardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1866
  3. Lindsay v. United States Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  4. Blanton v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  5. First Nat. Bank v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Norton v. LuskSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Opinion of JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. State Ex Rel. Wilkinson v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Kendrick v. BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  5. State Docks Commission v. State Ex Rel. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API