Waddingham v. Robledo
New Mexico Supreme Court
Error, from a decree in favor of defendants, to the Fourth Judicial District Court, San Miguel County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.
On the seventh day of February, 1888, complainants filed in the court below their bill of complaint, which, omitting the formal parts, is as follows:
" * * * Your orators, Wilson Waddingham and Julius O. Day, both residents of the county of New Haven and state of Connecticut, Louis Sulzbacher, a resident of the county of San Miguel and territory of New Mexico, and Thomas B. Catron, a resident of the county of Santa Fe and territory aforesaid, bring this their bill of complaint against Francisco Robledo, Francisco Lucero, Antonio Aloncon, Jose Apodaca, Feliz G-arcia, all residents of the county…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Holland v. ChallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Maxwell Land-Grant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Reynes v. DumontSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Kilbourn v. SunderlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- United States v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cartwright v. Public Service Company of New MexicoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Cartwright v. Public Service Company of New MexicoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- La Luz Community Ditch Co. v. Town of AlamogordoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929