Legal Opinion

Cartwright v. Public Service Company of New Mexico

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1959No. 6172Published

1DissentFederici, District Judge

First, it is the opinion of this writer that this is not a proper case in which to determine the applicability of the doctrine of Pueblo Water Rights in the State of New Mexico. This is so for the simple reason that the intervenor Town of Las Vegas does not in this action affirmatively assert such rights, or title to the waters, in itself, and it is the only possible party that could attempt to do so. True, the answers of intervenor and defendant Public Service Company make the bald declaration that the Public Service Company through its franchise and pertinent ordinances “is the…

Also in this document: Concurrence · McGHEE; Concurrence · McGHEE; Concurrence · Compton.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Hinderlider v. La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Hart v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Flaska v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API