La Luz Community Ditch Co. v. Town of Alamogordo

"It does not impair the effect of the estoppel, because Mattoon was mistaken as to the import of the instrument."

So in King v. Stroup, while admitting that there were cases holding to the contrary, we decided that (syllabus):

"Where one's conduct has led another to take a position detrimental to his interest, the former will not be heard to say that he is not estopped because of his ignorance of his legal rights in the first instance, provided he has full knowledge of the facts."

See, also, Bramwell v. Rowland (1927) 123 Or. 33, 261 P. 57.

Appellant also argues that the authorities point out…