Legal Opinion

Dunson v. FRIEDLANDER RLTY.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 6, 1979No. 77-744, 77-745PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The two cases involved in this appeal were consolidated by stipulation because they involve identical injuries and parties. The cases were filed by Fredrick W. Dunson, individually and as father and next friend of his two minor daughters, against Friedlander Realty, a corporation, fictitious individuals designated John Doe I through John Doe V and fictitious parties designated X Company and Y Company.

Each complaint contains five separate claims for relief against the various defendants. In all counts, plaintiffs, while tenants of rental property located at 815 South Broad Street, Mobile,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Adler v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Hart v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Chambers v. BuettnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  5. Hallock v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank v. Gilbert Imported Hardwoods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Antwaun A. Ex Rel. Muwonge v. Heritage Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Simpson v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Maples v. Chinese Palace, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  5. Bullen v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API