Legal Opinion

Schlarb v. NORTH SUBURBAN SANITATION DISTRICT

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 30, 1960No. 19027PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Knauss.

We shall refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court, where plaintiff in error was plaintiff and defendant in error was defendant.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover a sum of money paid to the defendant as a condition of having his property voluntarily annexed to the defendant district. Judgment was in favor of defendant and plaintiff brings the case here on writ of error.

Defendant is a sanitation district organized pursuant to C.R.S. ’53, 89-5-1, et seq., as amended. At the time of the organization of the defendant district the lands belonging…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Englewood v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  2. City of Aurora v. Aurora Sanitation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  3. Public Utilities Commission v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  4. City of Fort Collins v. Park View Pipe LineSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Matthews v. Tri-County Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. Bennett Bear Creek Farm Water & Sanitation District v. City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. City of Colorado Springs v. Kitty Hawk Development Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  4. Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Brookeville Turnpike Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Corp. v. LembkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API