Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Tomlan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 2008No. 2007-1595PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, John Richard Tomlan of St. Clairsville, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0007449, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1983.

{¶ 2} The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we now indefinitely suspend respondent’s license to practice based on findings that he (1) without her informed consent, transferred an elderly client’s financial assets to joint and survivorship accounts in both of their names, (2) concealed estate proceeds in his possession after his client died, (3) unduly delayed performing his duties as executor of the client’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Krischbaum v. DillonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Stark County Bar Ass'n v. AkeOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. TheofilosOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GalinasOhio Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. StaffordOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. StaffordOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. Holloway, 91005 (1-8-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API