Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Theofilos
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This court finds that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rule. While we adopt the board’s findings, we find that respondent’s conduct requires a more severe sanction than that recommended by the board. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents.
2Cited by14 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GalinasOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SaridakisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Toledo Bar Assn. v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Disciplinary Counsel v. TomlanOhio Supreme Court · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.