Legal Opinion

Walker v. Jacobsen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 18, 1982No. A7807-12258, CA A20141PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

This matter is before us on appellants’ objections to respondent’s cost bill and petition for an attorney fee on appeal. Appellants object to the cost bill on the ground that respondent is not the prevailing party; they object to the petition for an attorney fee on the grounds that (1) the agreement sued on does not provide for an attorney fee on appeal; and (2) the attorney fee petitioned for is unreasonable and excessive. We conclude that respondent is entitled to recover costs but not an attorney fee.

Appellants argue that respondent is not entitled to costs because he is not the prevailing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Adair v. McAteeOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. McMillan v. GoldenOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Weygandt v. BartleOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. BLUE RIBBON STEEL BUILDINGS, INC. v. StruthersOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. Chong BenOregon Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. RPR Landholding Partnership v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API