Legal Opinion
Obradovich v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 30, 1983No. 82 Civ. 2167, 82 Civ. 4409PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a former maintenance employee of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (“Federal Reserve”), appearing pro se, commenced two separate actions in this Court. Both center on events prior to and including his discharge after eight years’ employment as a painter.
In July 1981, prior to his termination, plaintiff filed a national origin discrimination complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) 1 against the Federal Reserve, Karl Jaus, his immediate supervisor and the foreman of the Maintenance Department, and Fred Eckhoff, the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Codd v. VelgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ignatius G. ANG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Patrowich v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Michael Mele v. Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Amarnare v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Aalgaard v. Merchants National Bank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.