Legal Opinion

Sturgeon v. Tacoma Eastern Railroad

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1908No. 7594PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Pierce county, Reid, J., entered May 25, 1908, granting a new trial in an action for personal injuries, after a verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.

— This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries. At the conclusion of the testimony the plaintiff requested the court to charge the jury in writing, but the request was refused and the jury were instructed orally. A verdict was thereafter returned in favor of the defendant and the plaintiff moved for a new trial. The new trial was granted for the sole reason that the court erred in refusing to charge the jury in writing as requested; and from the order granting the new trial, this appeal is prosecuted.

It appeared from the bill of exceptions that there was present at the trial,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MayoWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Rising-Sun & Versailles Turnpike Co. v. ConwayIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Collins v. HuffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. McIntosh v. Saw Mill PhoenixWashington Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Schon v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. EricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API