Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Padbury

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1941No. 8,121PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

This appeal is from a judgment for plaintiff in an action involving certain claims for wages. In the view we take of the case, no further discussion of the facts out of which the case arose is necessary. After trial, findings of fact and conclusions of law were entered on January 16, 1939. It was not until October 18, 1939, nine months later, that plaintiff presented a proposed judgment. It was presented in open court and at that time defendants’ counsel objected as follows: “Of course we object to the entry of judgment at this time for the reason it has expired by limitation.” In response…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Soliri v. FassoMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. State ex rel. Stiefel v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Rule v. ButoriMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Kasun v. TodevichMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Samuell v. Montana-Holland Colonization Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Couse v. DietzMontana Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API