Legal Opinion

Couse v. Dietz

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1945No. 8501PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cribadle

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs and against the defendant.

The complaint, filed May 1, 1941, is on an account for room rent, various hotel services, money advanced and miscellaneous-charges, furnished by plaintiffs to defendant, at the latter’s request, during the period 1930 to 1939, inclusive. It is alleged that said account was part and parcel of a continuing transaction during said period, no part of which has been paid. Ex-, hibit “A,” attached to the complaint, a statement of the account, sets forth items of cash advanced, room rent, merchandise and services paid,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Stiefel v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Spencer v. SowersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. McIntyre v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Rule v. ButoriMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Samuell v. Montana-Holland Colonization Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fauver v. WilkoskeMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Woodward v. PerkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API