Legal Opinion

Rule v. Butori

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1914No. 3,392PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Jefferson Countyj J. B. Poindexter, Judge. Action by J. H. Rule against Frank Butori and others. Judgment for plaintiff. From an order dismissing the action because judgment was not entered in time, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanner

On December 10, 1910, it was agreed by counsel that this cause, then pending in the district court of Jefferson county, should be submitted for determination by the court without a jury upon an agreed statement of facts; the agreed statement was thereupon prepared and filed and an order entered granting seventy-four days in all for the filing of briefs; by further agreement of counsel this time was so extended that more than six months elapsed before briefs were filed and the cause actually submitted; on June 12, 1912, the court made findings for the plaintiff and ordered that judgment be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Stiefel v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Pullen v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Marshall v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. State ex rel. Kohl v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Franzman v. DaviesMontana Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carnegie Nat. Bank v. City of Wolf PointCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  2. Hansen v. City of HavreMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Soliri v. FassoMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. State Ex Rel. McCabe v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Joyce v. McDonaldMontana Supreme Court · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API