Legal Opinion
Riggs v. Boeing Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided May 19, 2000No. Civ.A. 99-2090-CMPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MURGUIA, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant’s, The Boeing Company’s, motion for summary judgment (Doc. 57). 1 For the reasons set forth more fully below, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted.
As a preliminary matter, the court notes that the plaintiff, Ms. Riggs, appears pro se. The court advised the plaintiff that it would likely be helpful for her to secure the assistance of an attorney in this matter, and instructed her that she must follow the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules in prosecuting…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Smith v. Midland Brake, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Donald Barth v. Bruce S. Gelb, Director, United States Information AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ratts v. Board of County Com'rs, Harvey County, KSDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Cutler v. Hamden Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Brown v. UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. NO. 500, KANSAS CITYDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2005