Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1934No. 24439PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* Reporter's Note: For final disposition of this case see128 Ohio St. 272. This cause came on to be heard upon the petition of the relator and demurrer of respondent, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged that said demurrer be, and the same hereby is, sustained for the reason that the writ of mandamus is an extraordinary writ which is not available where there is a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law (State, ex rel. Bassichis, v. Zangerle,County Aud., 126 Ohio St. 118), and that Section 1465-90, General Code, which is now in force…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. VailOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  2. State Ex Rel. Bassichis v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State Ex Rel. Podley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of BereaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. AtkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Stough v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Derewicki v. Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API