State Ex Rel. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Atkinson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The controlling question raised by the general demurrer to the petition is: Did The Cleveland Railway Company, the relator herein, have an adequate remedy by way of appeal from a decision of the administrator on its application with respect to seasonal and casual employment?
If the right of appeal existed the relator is not entitled to a writ of mandamus on the facts alleged in the petition and the general demurrer thereto should be sustained.
The determination of the question of appealability requires the especial consideration of certain statutory provisions: (a) Section 1345-29, General Code…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. VailOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kunkler v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Hallworth v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
- City of Toledo v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- State Ex Rel. City of Grand Island v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.