Legal Opinion

Haddon v. Haddon

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 21, 1979No. 787DC1075Published

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Defendant first assigns as error the admission by the trial court of evidence concerning unnatural sex acts between the plaintiff and the defendant. Defendant contends that evidence of spousal sexual conduct is not admissible as such evidence constitutes a “confidential communication” within the meaning of G.S. 8-56.

G.S. 8-56 establishes a spousal privilege applicable to the testimony of husband or wife in “any action or proceeding in consequence of adultery, or in any action or proceeding for divorce on account of adultery, or in any action or proceeding for or on account of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Beall v. BeallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Peoples v. PeoplesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Hicks v. HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Wright v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Sprinkle v. SprinkleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API