Legal Opinion
Bloom v. Promaxima Manufacturing Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided November 9, 2009No. 05-CV-6735-CJSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
CHARLES J. SIRAGUSA, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This diversity personal injury case is before the Court for consideration of four motions: Docket No. 63, motion filed by Woodcliff Associates LLC, d/b/a The Lodge at Woodcliff (“Woodcliff’) for summary judgment; Docket No. 64, motion filed by M-F Athletic Company, Inc. (“MF Athletic”) for partial summary judgment on its indemnification claim and for preclusion of testimony of Plaintiffs’ expert, Charles H. Pittman (“Pittman”); Docket No. 69, motion filed by ProMaxima Manufacturing, Ltd. (“ProMaxima”) to preclude testimony by…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Argonaut Insurance v. Samsung Heavy Industries Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 2013
- Vecchiarino v. RidgwayVermont Superior Court · 2026