Legal Opinion
Murakush Caliphate of Amexem Inc. v. New Jersey
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 13, 2011No. Civil Action 11-1317 (RBK)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT B. KUGLER, District Judge.
This matter comes before this Court upon the Clerk’s receipt of two groups of submissions; both submissions were made on behalf of the same entity named as the plaintiff. See Murakush Caliphates of Amexem v. State of New Jersey (“Instant Matter”), Civ. Action No. 11-1317, and Murakush Caliphate of Amexem Inc. v. Simandle (“Caliphate”), Civ. Action No. 11-1316(MLC). The Instant Matter was assigned to the undersigned. The initial submissions made in the Instant Matter consisted of six documents, see Instant Matter, Docket Entries Nos. 1, 1-1 to 1-4, and…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- El Ameen Bey v. StumpfDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- International Fund Management S.A. v. Citigroup Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Wiatt v. Winston & Strawn LLPDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
- Thomas v. AdamsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- ADDERLEY v. AUSTINDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2024
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.