Legal Opinion
Oregon Natural Resources Council v. Daley
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 1, 1998No. CV 97-1155-STPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEWART, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, a-group of environmental organizations, challenge the determination by defendants William M. Daley, the Secretary of Commerce, and Rolland A. Schmitten, the Director of the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”), 1 that the Oregon Coast evolutionarily significant unit of coho (silver) salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) (“Oregon Coast ESU”) did not warrant listing as a threatened or endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 USC §§ 1531-1544. 62 Fed Reg 24,588, 24,607-08 (May 6, 1997), (Exhibit l). 2…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ethyl Corp. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Friends of Endangered Species, Inc. v. JantzenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. State of WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Defenders of Wildlife v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Alsea Valley Alliance v. EvansDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2001
- Defenders Of Wildlife v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Maine v. NortonDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.