Legal Opinion
Marriage of Kelly v. Kelly
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 8, 1985No. C6-83-1863PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge
In Kelly v. Kelly, 348 N.W.2d 397 (Minn.Ct.App.1984), under the facts there, we ruled the trial court’s awards of child support and attorney’s fees were not reviewable. The Minnesota Supreme Court subsequently held refusal to review was erroneous and remanded to this court for decision on the merits. Kelly v. Kelly, 371 N.W.2d 193 (Minn.1985). We now review the awards.
In this appeal, appellant claims the trial court (1) abused its discretion in its child support award, and (2) abused its discretion by awarding respondent $1200 in attorney’s fees without proof of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marriage of Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Linderman v. LindermanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Riley v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Ryan v. Bigos Properties Ex Rel. BigosCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Stewart v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gopher Oil Co., Inc. v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Marriage of Savoren v. SavorenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Dicks v. DicksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- In Re Marriage of Edlund v. TennisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986