Legal Opinion
Office of People's Counsel v. Public Service Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 2, 2002No. 01-AA-572PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
In this appeal, the Office of the People’s Counsel asks us to vacate a Public Service Commission order approving a tariff amendment sought by Verizon Washington, DC Inc. The amendment would expand the category of home-based business customers of Verizon who are eligible for telephone service at favorable residential rates. The Office of the People’s Counsel contends that the amendment unjustly discriminates against Verizon’s other business customers and argues that the Commission’s approval is fatally flawed on the ground that it is not supported by substantial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Clark v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Apartment House Council of Metropolitan Washington, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Watergate East, Inc. v. District of Columbia Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vogel v. District of Columbia Office of PlanningDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- D.C. Appleseed Center for Law & Justice, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Insurance, Securities, & BankingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Eagle Maintenance Services, Inc. v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Office of People's Counsel v. District of Columbia Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Office of the People's Counsel v. District of Columbia Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026