Legal Opinion
Bowles v. Rumph & Associates
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided June 5, 2023No. 5:21-cv-01624Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION LAJUANNA BOWLES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 5:21-cv-01624-HNJ ) RUMPH & ASSOCIATES, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On December 7, 2021, Plaintiff Lajuanna Bowles filed a pro se Complaint. (Doc. 1). She claimed Thomas Rumph, her former employer’s Managing Partner, and Vastell Williams, her former employer’s Finance Manager, terminated her employment, failed to accommodate her disability, and subjected her to unequal terms and conditions of employment because of her pregnancy and post-partum…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Burger King Corp. v. WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Gladys Gregory v. Georgia Dept. of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Odessa Dee Hall v. United Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.