United States v. Sirles
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
MILES, Judge:
Consistent with his pleas, the accused was convicted of wrongful appropriation and four larcenies in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921.1 The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for sixteen months, total forfeitures and reduction to airman basic.
The accused contends he was denied his right to a speedy trial by the government’s failure to comply with the time standards established in Air Force Manual 111-1, Military Justice Guide, 2 July 1973, C-2, 8 October 1976, paragraph 1-3. We…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
- United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- Dettinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. BanksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. McGranerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. CantuU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982