Legal Opinion

United States v. Sirles

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided June 26, 1980No. ACM 22643PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

MILES, Judge:

Consistent with his pleas, the accused was convicted of wrongful appropriation and four larcenies in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921.1 The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for sixteen months, total forfeitures and reduction to airman basic.

The accused contends he was denied his right to a speedy trial by the government’s failure to comply with the time standards established in Air Force Manual 111-1, Military Justice Guide, 2 July 1973, C-2, 8 October 1976, paragraph 1-3. We…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  3. United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  4. Dettinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  5. United States v. BanksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. McGranerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. CantuU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API