United States v. Maupin
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
Todd Maupin appeals his 240-month and 480-month sentences imposed following his guilty plea to two child pornography counts, both in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A. Maupin asserts the district court erred in enhancing his sentences based on its determination that a 1991 nolo contendere plea with adjudication withheld to Florida child pornography charges was a prior conviction warranting a sentencing enhancement under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(b)(l) and (b)(2). We conclude the district court did not err in enhancing Maupin’s sentences, and affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Maupin was charged with knowingly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Jose Mejias, A/K/A Meija, JoeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Cornelius JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Donald Daye StorerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. McGarityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Robert William GreenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. AldrichCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Sally JimCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.