Legal Opinion
United States v. Sally Jim
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 4, 2018No. 16-17109PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:
In 1988, Congress enacted the Indian Gaming Revenue Act ("IGRA"), Pub. L. No. 100-497, 102 Stat. 2467 (1988) (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq. ), "to protect the Indian gaming industry from corruption and to provide for extensive federal oversight of all but the most rudimentary forms of Indian gaming," Tamiami Partners, Ltd. By & Through Tamiami Dev. Corp. v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Fla. , 63 F.3d 1030 , 1033 (11th Cir. 1995). IGRA permits an Indian tribe to engage in gaming and to distribute the revenue from gaming activities to its members on a per capita…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- David Sapuppo, Theresa Sapuppo v. Allstate Floridian Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Matthew Bryan CaniffCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Matthew Bryan CaniffCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Susan Drazen v. Juan PintoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
- Amanda Curlee v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
- James Clay v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.