Legal Opinion

United States v. Aldrich

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 27, 2009No. 08-15556PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Opinion of the Court

BARKETT, Circuit Judge:

Jack Aldrich appeals his 168-month sentence for using a computer to entice a minor to engage in sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). Aid-rich argues that the district court erred in applying a two-level enhancement at sentencing under U.S.S.G. § 2G2.1(b)(2)(A) based on a finding that Aldrich’s masturbating for a minor female 1 in front of his web camera constituted a “sexual contact.” Aldrich also raises a due process argument based on the alleged inaccuracy of the statement in his presentence investigation report (“PSI”) that Aldrich was masturbating…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Randall v. LoftsgaardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Geovanni Quintero RendonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. MaupinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Republic of Ecuador v. Robert E. HincheeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  2. Securities and Exchange Commission v. George G. LevinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Aseracare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Edgar John Dawson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
  5. United States v. Robert PawlowskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API