Legal Opinion

Hubicki v. Festina

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided March 21, 2005No. 05-04-00805-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice WHITTINGTON.

Frank Maryan Brandstetter Hubicki appeals a default judgment entered in favor of Festina, a Liechtenstein Foundation. In three issues, Hubicki contends service of process was defective; the trial court should not have entered judgment for punitive damages; and there was no or insufficient evidence to support an award of damages. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Background

In its original petition, Festina alleged it loaned Hubicki a sum exceeding two million dollars. Hubicki allegedly promised the loan would be repaid from the proceeds of the sale…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Primate Construction, Inc. v. SilverTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Norman Communications v. Texas Eastman Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hubicki v. FestinaTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Texas Department of Public Safety v. Jacobs, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  3. Thomas v. Martinez, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  4. JSC Neftegas-Impex v. Citibank, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  5. JSC Neftegas-Impex v. Citibank, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API