Legal Opinion

Gus Kirk, Candy Kirk, as Individuals, and D/B/A Kirk Enterprises v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 14, 1991No. 89-70389PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:

Gus Kirk and Candy Kirk appeal the Immigration and Naturalization Service’s (“INS”) chief administrative hearing officer’s (“CAHO”) decision affirming the administrative law judge’s (“AU”) default judgment imposing employer sanctions on the Kirks under 8 U.S.C. § 1324a. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1324a(e)(8), and we affirm.

FACTS

Following an inspection by the INS, Gus and Candy Kirk, the owners of Kirk Enterprises, were served with a notice of intent to fine (“NIF”) for alleged violations under 8 U.S.C. § 1324a(a)(l)(B). The Kirks, through their…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Direct Mail Specialists, Inc. v. Eclat Computerized Technologies, Inc., Dba Computerized TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Smith v. AyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Reid v. EngenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Lueleni Maka, Dba Maka's Akamai Service, and Maka's Akamai Service Inc. v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Veterans for Common Sense v. PeakeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
  2. Virtual Vision, Inc. v. Praegitzer Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. In Re: Virtual Vision, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. Tift v. Snohomish CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2011
  5. (PS) Ward v. County of Sacramento Dept. of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API