Tift v. Snohomish County

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court on defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (dkt. # 38) and plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (dkt. # 79). In defendants’ motion, they seek dismissal of every cause of action. Pro se plaintiff Gregory Tift argues that summary judgment is inappropriate because he has demonstrated genuine issues of material fact. Plaintiff requests summary judgment as to his trespass claim against defendants Sant, Giralmo and Jones. Dkt.…