United States v. SIX DOZEN BOTTLES, ETC.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, District Judge.
The claimant, an Illinois corporation with its principal place of business at Chicago, moves for an order transferring this proceeding to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, asserting that trial in this district would cause it undue hardship, prevent it from making proper proof of its defenses, and cause great inconvenience to its witnesses, even .preventing some of them, whose testimony would be material, from attending the trial.
This proceeding is under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 52 Stat. 1040, 21…
2Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. 23 GROSS JARS, ETC.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Western Division, and Honorable Thomas C. Trimble, Chief JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. 600 Units Containing" Nue-Ovo"District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1945
- United States v. 91 PACKAGES, ETC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1950
- United States v. 26 Dozen Bottles of Wheatamin Brand CevigardsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.