Legal Opinion

Romas v. Huffcut

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoward A. Zeller, J.

These are motions to dismiss applications made under article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law for a review of certain real property tax assessments upon the assessment rolls of the Town of Union for the year 1962-1963.

Respondents contend on their motions that the petitions must be dismissed because they do not show that the applicants served, and in fact did not serve, a proper and timely complaint to the officers responsible for correction of assessments for 1962 as required by sections 512 and 706 of the Real Property Tax Law. Section 706 states that a petition to review an assessment “must…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of CorwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. People ex rel. Bingham Operating Corp. v. EyrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  3. People ex rel. Empire Mortgage Co. v. CantorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  4. People Ex Rel. Eckerson v. . ChristieNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. People ex rel. Benedict v. RoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Raer Corp. v. Village Board of TrusteesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Henderson v. SilcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  3. People ex rel. Kidsanne Realty Corp. v. Village of PelhamNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Mott Haven Furniture Co. v. Finance AdministratorNew York Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API