Auster Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Matilda Gray Stream
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JERRE S. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:
The district court dismissed the complaint of appellant Auster Oil & Gas Company as to appellees Matilda Gray Stream and M.G.S. of Lake Charles, Inc., on the ground that Auster had failed to state a claim against them under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court also denied Auster’s motion to amend its pleading to allege facts it discovered after the dismissal. We hold that Auster’s original complaint stated a section 1983 claim and that the district court should have allowed the amendment. We accordingly vacate the judgment and remand the ease for further proceedings.
I.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Dino Cinel v. Harry F. Connick, Individually and as District Attorney for the Parish of Orleans, State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Richard McGary v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Santiago, etc. v. Canon, U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Wimm v. Jack Eckerd Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- John E. Washington v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.