Legal Opinion

Page v. Andreasen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1978No. 41386PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

This is an action by the buyers of a registered paint horse to recover damages for misrepresentation because the horse purchased had been freeze altered to enhance the white markings on the horse. This action was brought against the owner and seller of the horse, Janet I. Andreasen and her father, Orval Andreasen. The trial court granted a sum mary judgment to Orval Andreasen and plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

Plaintiffs purchased Deano’s Cryin Time, a registered paint horse, from Janet I. Andreasen for $900. Janet was the sole owner of the horse from the time it was foaled. She lived with her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pfeifer v. PfeiferNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Bellairs v. DuddenNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Gerdes v. SpetmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. McGinty v. McGintyNebraska Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tobin v. Flynn & Larsen Implement Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Ames Bank v. HahnNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Nielsen v. AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Erftmier v. EickhoffNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. De Los Santos v. Great Western Sugar Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API