Legal Opinion
Ames Bank v. Hahn
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided January 22, 1980No. 42544PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.
The plaintiff, Ames Bank, appeals from an order sustaining the demurrer of the defendant, Howard F. Hahn, and dismissing the action as to all defendants.
The amended petition alleged in its first cause of action that the defendant Hahn was a lawyer associated with and employed by the defendants, Warren S. Zweiback, Mark L. Laughlin, and Zweiback & Laughlin, a partnership; that on October 14, 1974, Bruce N. Miller, as president of E. G. Miller Realty Company, delivered a promissory note in the amount of $153,358.60 to the plaintiff; that Hahn and Zweiback & Laughlin represented Bruce N. Miller,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Campbell v. C & C Motor Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1946
- Page v. AndreasenNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
3Cited by23 opinions
- Rahmig v. Mosley MacHinery Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Strong v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Streeks, Inc. v. Diamond Hill Farms, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Earth Science Laboratories, Inc. v. Adkins & Wondra, P.C.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Stansbery v. SchroederNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.