Legal Opinion

Nielsen v. Adams

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1986No. 85-834PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrivosha, C. J.

This appeal concerns the essential elements which must be established in order to sustain an action for fraudulent misrepresentation. A review of the cases previously decided by this court discloses that there appears to be a conflict as to what these essential elements are. This conflict, however, can be resolved. Nevertheless, for reasons more particularly set out hereinafter, we find that the district court judgment in the instant case must be set aside and the cause remanded for a new trial in accordance with this opinion.

The record discloses that early in January of 1984 the appellant,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Flakus v. SchugNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Erftmier v. EickhoffNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Christopher v. EvansNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. SWANSON PETROLEUM CORPORATION v. CumberlandNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Campbell v. C & C Motor Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Snyder v. LovercheckWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Alliance National Bank & Trust Co. v. State Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Gibb v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Holmes v. Crossroads Joint VentureNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Dammann v. LittyNebraska Supreme Court · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API