Blackwell v. Renwick
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. Curtis D. Wilbur, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Plaintiff sued to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been suffered through the negligence of defendant. The cause was tried before the court sitting without a jury, and the findings and judgment were in favor of plaintiff. The alleged negligent acts of defendant consisted in so driving an automobile on a public street at the outskirts of the city of Los Angeles that it collided with plaintiff, who was a pedestrian upon the street. At the outset it may be observed that there was a conflict in the evidence as to the manner in which the accident occurred. Plaintiff testified that at…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fox v. Oakland Consolidated Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Schierhold v. North Beach & Mission RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Davis v. Pac. Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Daly v. HinzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- White v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Mann v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Randolph v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Shannon v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.