Daly v. Hinz
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries.
At the 'time of the injuries plaintiff, then about seven years of age, was upon a public street in the city .of San Francisco, and was playing “tag” with his sister and another girl, each óf the age of about eleven years. They were in front of the house where plaintiff and his parents resided. Defendant was driving a horse attached to a buggy, which passed over the plaintiff, breaking his left thigh bone and otherwise injuring him. Plaintiff had been going to school for about a year, at some distance from his home,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kline v. Cent. Pac. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1869
- Schierhold v. North Beach & Mission RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Meeks v. S. Pac. R. R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1878
- Higgins v. DeeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Huerzeler v. Central Cross Town RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
3Cited by13 opinions
- Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Zarzana v. Neve Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Boyle v. Coast Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Seperman v. Lyon Fire Proof Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Blackwell v. RenwickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.