Pursley for Benefit of Clark v. Ford Motor
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SHIELDS, Judge.
Marie Pursley, individually and as Ad-ministratrix of the Estate of James A. Clark, (Pursley) appeals the entry of summary judgment against her in favor of Ford Motor Company (Ford) in her action for damages for personal injuries and for wrongful death. The issue before us is whether Ford owed a duty to Pursley to control the conduct of its employee, Campbell, i.e., his consumption of alcohol during working hours, to prevent him from thereafter proximately causing physical harm to Pursley and Clark. 1
Judgment affirmed.
Harold Campbell (Campbell) was an employee of Ford on…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Duane S. Marusa v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- McCrink v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Fletcher v. Baltimore & Potomac RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Perry v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- F. W. Means & Co. v. CarstensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lamb v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Gail D. Konradi, Personal Representative of the Estate of Glenn J. Konradi v. United States of America and Robert E. FarringerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Wong-Leong v. Hawaiian Independent Refinery, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Mosko v. Raytheon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- City of Crawfordsville v. MichaelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.