Legal Opinion

Ashenfelder v. City of Georgetown

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 11, 2010No. 4725PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this cross-appeal, the City of Georgetown (the City) alleges the trial court erred in denying its directed verdict motions on David Ashenfelder’s causes of action for conversion and prescriptive easement. Ashenfelder alleges the trial court erred in granting directed verdicts on his causes of action for adverse possession, declaratory judgment, estoppel, trespass, and inverse condemnation prior to the declaration of a mistrial. We dismiss the appeal as premature.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A vehicle struck and severely damaged a billboard in Georgetown operated by Ashenfelder. Prior to the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Fields v. J. Haynes Waters Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  2. Olson v. Faculty House of Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Link v. School District of Pickens CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. Grooms v. ZanderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. GlennSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ashenfelder v. City of GeorgetownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API