Legal Opinion

Purcell Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Lykins

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 21, 1926No. 16884Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, O.

This action was instituted in the county court ot Carter county by the plaintifi m error, as plaintiff, against the defendants in error, as defendants. to recover on a certain promissory note executed by defendants and payable to plaiu-tiff.

The defendants filed separate answers. The defendant Brown, among other things, averred :

“That he had no interest in the consideration for same, but signed at the solicitations of the defendant Lykins, as accommodation surety, and that fact was well known to plaintiff; that thereafter, and on the 19th day of Novemoei, 1920, ne, Brown,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. HodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. Oklahoma State Bank of Sayre v. SeatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Cleveland Nat. Bank v. BickelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Schafer v. Midland Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Roberson v. BlevinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API