Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Edwards

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1924No. 18181PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The following áre the assignments of error of the plaintiff in error, the city of Cleveland :

“(a) The judgment of the Court of Appeals is contrary to law, in that it holds the power of a municipality to levy assessments for a water main (which power municipalities had at the time the deed in question was made) to have been contracted away by the plaintiff in error.
“(b) The judgment of the Court of Appeals is contrary to law, in that it holds a municipality may, by agreement, exempt abutting property from assessments for unnamed improvements to be constructed in tbe future.
“(c) The Court of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coit v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State ex rel. Townsend v. Board of Park CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. Giles v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Leggett v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. City of St. Louis v. MeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Gordon v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Lamar Bath House Co. v. City of Hot SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  3. Lucas County v. PeakOhio Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API