Legal Opinion

Lamar Bath House Co. v. City of Hot Springs

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 16, 1958No. 5-1536PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. Seaborn Holt, Associate Justice.

In 1934 the City of Hot Springs entered into an agreement with the National Park Service, Department of Interior, relative to the construction of a city sewer system and sewage plant in Hot Springs. The parties recognizing that Hot Springs’ reservation, including- appellant’s bath houses located thereon, contributed largely to the city’s sewage, the Park Service agreed to pay 22.5 per cent of the construction cost and an additional 5 per cent in lieu of maintenance and operation charges. Park Service in the aggregate contributed $82,000. Appellants’ bath…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Portsmouth v. Mitchell Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Ericksen v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State Ex Rel. Gordon v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Risser v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  5. City of Cleveland v. EdwardsOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Robert T. Foley Co. v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Barnhart v. City of Fayetteville, Ark.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Goodwin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  4. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. City of BentonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. Spray v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API