Legal Opinion
Superior Stucco v. Daniels
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 7, 1995No. 84938PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
The issue is whether the Workers’ Compensation Court was presented competent evidence that the worker’s injury was causally connected to an employment-related risk. This Court holds that the workers’ compensation award was supported by competent evidence of that causal connection.
Raymond Daniels, a white man, was employed by Superior Stucco. The owner of the company told him that the black contractors who were promised a particular job were not qualified and that Superior Stucco was therefore selected. Daniels reported to the construction site in North Tulsa in a predominately…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- American Management Systems, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. ReinholtzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- K-Mart Corp. v. HerringSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Central Plains Construction v. HicksonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
- GEFCO v. PoolCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- Hollman v. Comfort Care, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.