Legal Opinion
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Reinholtz
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 5, 1998No. 86623PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMMS, Justice:
¶ 1 This case concerns the workers’ compensation claim of Terri Reinholtz for disability based on psychological overlay.
¶ 2 Claimant, a Wal-Mart employee, was forcefully and brutally raped by her supervisor while at work in the early working hours of February 19, 1995. The assailant-supervisor had been in the employ of Wal-Mart for over ten (10) years. Claimant was employed in an assistant customer service position at the automotive department at a Tulsa area store. Her duties included opening and closing the automotive store, securing the register and conducting inventory…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Thomas v. Keith Hensel Optical LabsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- American Management Systems, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Fenwick v. Oklahoma State PenitentiarySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Town of Granite v. KidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnson v. City of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Rogers v. Burger King Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
- Shivel v. Wexford Health SourcesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Griffin v. Baker Petrolite Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
- City of Norman v. HelmCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.